Case 3331576/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs R M Phillips (2) Mrs E Tye (3) Mrs M Dye (4) Mrs S Miles v The Diocese of Westminster Academy Trust and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331576/2018
- Decision date
- 15 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Appearances
Parties
4 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs R M Phillips (2) Mrs E Tye (3) Mrs M Dye (4) Mrs S Miles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment heard by telephone on 14 March 2019 before Employment Judge Brown. The judgment records the parties and representatives, but it does not set out any substantive findings on liability or remedy.
The tribunal ordered that the First and Second Claimants' claims against the Second Respondent be dismissed on withdrawal. No underlying cause of action is identified in the text of the judgment, so the claim is recorded here as other.
The judgment also records, by consent, that the respondent to the Third Claimant's claim should be the First Respondent, and that the Third Respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. No further substantive determination is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the First and Second Claimants' claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.