Case 3331671/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Brittenden, Counsel For the First v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331671/2018
- Decision date
- 18 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Brittenden, Counsel For the First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Foxwell in Cambridge on 18 December 2019. The tribunal did not determine the merits of any claim. Its decision was limited to case management of the limitation issue.
The judgment states that the questions whether the claimant’s claims were presented within the time limit in section 123 of the Equality Act 2010, and whether any late claim should be permitted because it is just and equitable to do so, would be dealt with at the final hearing. The reasons were given orally and recorded in the case management summary sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal did not adjudicate any substantive claim; it directed that time-limit and just-and-equitable issues under section 123 Equality Act 2010 be dealt with at the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.