Case 3331722/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331722/2018
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Kurrein gave extempore oral reasons on 1 November 2019. The judgment records that Mr C Gibson was entitled to a redundancy payment from the Second Respondent, which was the only substantive relief recorded in the extracted text.
The tribunal also dismissed the claims against the other respondents. The extracted reasons do not set out any further findings on liability, the amount of the redundancy payment, or any separate monetary award.
Because the judgment is very short, the extracted text does not identify any explicit legal test or statutory provision by name beyond the redundancy payment outcome itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment from the Second Respondent. The claims against the other respondents were dismissed. No monetary amount is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.