Case 3331726/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A. Jones v VATIT UK Ltd and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331726/2018
- Decision date
- 13 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms A. Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 5 March 2019, before Employment Judge McNeill QC, the tribunal recorded that Ms A. Jones brought claims against VATIT UK Ltd, Mr Brendon Silver and Mr Saul Goldstein. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of the claims.
The tribunal stated that the claim for unlawful deduction of wages for accrued holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. It also stated that the claims for indirect race discrimination and indirect religion or belief discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal. No remedy was awarded and no separate monetary figures were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim described as an unlawful deduction of wages claim for accrued holiday pay; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records an indirect race discrimination claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records an indirect religion or belief discrimination claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.