Case 3331769/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331769/2018
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bloom Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment records that the case was heard at Bury St Edmunds on 27 November 2019 before Employment Judge Bloom. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. No lay members are listed, and the judgment contains no findings on the underlying facts or merits of the dispute.
The tribunal stated that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal of those claims by the claimant. The text does not set out any substantive determination on liability, nor does it identify any remedy, compensation, or other monetary award. The procedural outcome recorded is therefore that the claims were withdrawn and dismissed on that basis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; no separate merits determination is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; no separate merits determination is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.