Case 3331822/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Micallef v BAP Transport Limited(In Administration) & Others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331822/2018
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Micallef
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike out decision, not a determination of the underlying merits. Employment Judge Warren recorded that by letter dated 03/06/2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-prosecution.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the pleaded employment issues or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Strike out under rule 37 for failure to actively pursue the claim. The Tribunal sent a letter dated 03/06/2019 inviting representations or a hearing request, but the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.