Case 3331848/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K McGill v Workplace Options LLC and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3331848/2018
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mrs AE Brown, Mrs F Betts
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs K McGill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K McGill was employed by the second respondent, Employee Advisory Resource Limited. The tribunal found that her complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded.
Her complaints of direct discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments were dismissed. The written decision does not set out the tribunal's full reasons, because oral reasons were given at the hearing and no written reasons were requested within the time allowed.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the second respondent to pay a compensatory award of £2,937.20. It made no basic award because the claimant had already received a statutory redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded. The tribunal ordered a compensatory award of £2,937.20. | Upheld | — | £2,937 |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of direct discrimination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,937
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,937
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.