Case 3331878/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Odekeye v And Berks Healthcare Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3331878/2018
- Decision date
- 15 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Odekeye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 8 September 2020, the Tribunal wrote to Mr J Odekeye saying an Employment Judge was considering striking out the claim because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 4 October 2019 and the claim had not been actively pursued. He was given until 22 September 2020 to object or to request a hearing.
Mr Odekeye did not respond to the Tribunal's letter. The Tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because of non-compliance with the earlier order and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Vowles and dated 15 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the underlying substantive claim type; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. The claim was dismissed under Rule 37 because of non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 4 October 2019 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.