Case 3331923/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Mayhew v Ms K J Provan & Mr G P Shankland "In Administration" — 2020
- Case reference
- 3331923/2018
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Mayhew
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 1 December 2019, the tribunal gave Mr C Mayhew an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concerns were that he had not complied with tribunal orders dated 8 November 2018, 8 June 2019 and 20 October 2019, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Ord struck the claim out in the judgment dated 9 January 2020, sent to the parties on 23 January 2020. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal did not determine the underlying substantive claim. It struck the claim out because the claimant had not complied with tribunal orders dated 8 November 2018, 8 June 2019 and 20 October 2019, and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.