Case 3331927/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Nagy v Realstar Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331927/2018
- Decision date
- 22 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Nagy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Bedeau issued a liability-only judgment in favour of Mr M Nagy after Realstar Limited failed to enter a response. The judgment records that the claimant succeeded in respect of breach of contract, holiday pay, and failure to provide a written statement.
The decision does not set out detailed findings of fact or legal reasoning beyond the respondent's failure to respond and the resulting judgment for the claimant. It is therefore limited to liability and does not record any assessment of remedy at this stage.
The judgment states that any remedy due to the claimant would be determined at a further hearing listed for 22 January 2019 at 10:00 am.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Liability only judgment; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. The respondent failed to enter a response. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Liability only judgment; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. The respondent failed to enter a response. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment also records a claim for failure to provide a written statement. Liability only judgment; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. The respondent failed to enter a response. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.