Case 3331963/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr AC Prescott v Kuehne + Nagel Drinks Logistics Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331963/2018
- Decision date
- 15 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr AC Prescott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had not presented a response. On that basis, judgment was entered for the claimant, Mr AC Prescott, in respect of his complaints of unfair dismissal, unpaid wages and holiday pay against Kuehne + Nagel Drinks Logistics Limited.
The judgment does not determine any monetary remedy. It states that any remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be decided at a separate Remedy Hearing listed for 10:00am on Friday 15 March 2019 at Watford Employment Tribunal, with a three-hour time allocation.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment entered for the claimant under Rule 21 because no response had been presented. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this claim as 'unpaid wages' and enters judgment for the claimant because no response had been presented. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Judgment entered for the claimant because no response had been presented. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.