Case 3331974/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A King v Careshield Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3331974/2018
- Decision date
- 13 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A King brought claims against Careshield Limited at Bury St Edmunds. The written judgment records that the case was heard on 13 August 2019 before Employment Judge M Warren, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Famotimi, consultant.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims in breach of contract and for unpaid wages failed. Both claims were dismissed.
The short written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's breach of contract claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages failed and was dismissed; the written record does not separate any monetary award for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.