Case 3332133/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Skipper v Nick Tominey — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332133/2018
- Decision date
- 21 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Skipper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 18 February 2019, following a judgment entered for the claimant under Rule 21, Employment Judge Henry ordered Nick Tominey to pay Mr P Skipper £50 for an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of rent. The judgment also records that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of terms and conditions of employment, and it awards the claimant two weeks' wages of £960 for that failure.
The tribunal further awarded £96 for accrued but untaken holiday. The total sum ordered was £1,106, and the hearing listed for 21 March 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages for rent and ordered payment of £50. | Upheld | — | £50 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of terms and conditions of employment and awarded two weeks' wages of £960. | Upheld | — | £960 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £96 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £96 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,106
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.