Case 3332206/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Steel, Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332206/2018
- Decision date
- 9 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Members
- Venue
- Norwich
- Panel members
- Mr R Allen, Mrs L Gaywood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records a hearing at Norwich on 8 and 9 July 2019 before Employment Judge Postle, sitting with Mr R Allen and Mrs L Gaywood. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Steel, solicitor.
The tribunal's written decision states that the claimant's claims against B & M Retail Limited were dismissed upon withdrawal. No findings on liability or remedy are set out in the written record, and the note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The record also states that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or is presented in writing within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The supplied written record does not set out the underlying facts for this head of claim; it records that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The supplied written record does not set out the underlying facts for this head of claim; it records that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.