Case 3332207/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y Oppong v Nigel Fredericks & Others — 2026
- Case reference
- 3332207/2018
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Y Oppong
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order on postponement sent on 09.08.19, the tribunal gave Mr Y Oppong an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal identified two possible grounds for strike out: that the proceedings had been conducted unreasonably by or on behalf of the claimant, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Oppong did not make any written or other representations and did not request a hearing. In the absence of any response, the tribunal struck out the claim on 07.01.20. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after an order on postponement dated 09.08.19 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. The stated grounds were unreasonable conduct of the proceedings and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.