Case 3332421/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Cyrus v And Reading Borough Council Private Preliminary Hearing (Case Management) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332421/2018
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Cyrus
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a private preliminary hearing (case management) at Reading on 10 October 2019 before Employment Judge Vowles. The judgment records that, after the judge explained the requirements of sections 13 and 19 of the Equality Act 2010, the Claimant accepted that he did not have grounds to pursue claims of direct or indirect sex discrimination or direct or indirect race discrimination.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant withdrew his direct and indirect sex discrimination claims after the Employment Judge explained sections 13 and 19 Equality Act 2010; they were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant withdrew his direct and indirect race discrimination claims after the Employment Judge explained sections 13 and 19 Equality Act 2010; they were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 13 and 19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.