Case 3332431/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 3332431/2018 Held at Edinburgh on June 20195 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Jill Morrison v Bestway Wholesale Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332431/2018
- Decision date
- 1 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 3332431/2018 Held at Edinburgh on June 20195 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Jill Morrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented a claim on 29 August 2018 complaining that she had been unfairly dismissed by Bestway Wholesale Ltd. Her employment had ended with effect from 16 April 2018 following dismissal without notice for gross misconduct, and her internal appeal was rejected by letter dated 13 June 2018. The preliminary hearing on 10 June 2019 was listed to determine whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the case.
The claimant had not supplied an ACAS Early Conciliation certificate number in her ET1 and stated that this was because her employer had already been in touch with ACAS. The Tribunal considered the ACAS letter dated 22 November 2018, the email from Jenny McDermott dated 9 August 2018, and the claimant's evidence about a telephone conversation with Ms McDermott. It found that the ACAS letter was sent after the claim had been presented, that Ms McDermott's email did not show the respondent had contacted ACAS, and that the claimant had not proved that the respondent had done so.
Applying the Early Conciliation provisions and Rule 10, the Tribunal concluded that no Early Conciliation certificate had been provided and no basis for an exemption had been established. The Tribunal therefore held that it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. Because of that conclusion, it did not decide the respondent's alternative time-bar argument under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the Tribunal found the Early Conciliation requirements had not been satisfied; the merits of the unfair dismissal complaint were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- s.18A(7) Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Regulation 3(1)(c) Employment Tribunals (Early Conciliation: Exemptions and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2014
- Cranwell v Cullen UKEATPAS/0046/14/SM
- Rule 10 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.