Case 3332436/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Ayres and others v Taylor Newspapers Limited (In Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332436/2018
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Ayres and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant group brought a complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 seeking a protective award. The respondent did not defend the claim. The tribunal recorded that Taylor Newspapers Limited was placed into creditors’ voluntary liquidation on 25 June 2018 and that, as at 29 May 2018, it employed 20 employees at 4a Hawkesworth, Southmead, Didcot.
The tribunal found that all employees were dismissed as redundant on 29 May 2018 and that, before those dismissals, there had been no communication that redundancies were proposed. It found that the employees had no appropriate representatives, that no opportunity was given to elect employee representatives, that no employee representatives were elected, and that there was no consultation at all before the redundancies took effect.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the complaint under section 188 was well founded. It noted that consultation in a case of 20 or more proposed redundancies must begin in good time, at least 30 days before the first dismissal takes effect, and must cover ways of avoiding dismissals, reducing numbers, and mitigating consequences with a view to reaching agreement.
As the failure to consult was complete and no mitigating circumstances were identified or advanced, the tribunal applied the maximum protected period and made a protective award of 90 days under section 189(4). The judgment does not quantify a monetary total in the text provided, but records the 90-day protective period for the affected employees dismissed on 29 May 2018.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to consult before dismissals as redundant. The tribunal made a protective award with a protected period of 90 days. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189(4) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.