Case 3332454/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Mr J E Miller (Director). — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332454/2018
- Decision date
- 7 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded the correct identity of the respondent as Ellis Miller Architectural Design Ltd. It found that Mr N Sardar had suffered unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £495.97, and that he had not been paid accrued holiday pay on termination of employment, with net holiday pay of £996.50 awarded.
The tribunal also found that Mr Sardar was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £2,141.06 as compensation on that claim. The total award was £3,633.53. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £496 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the claimant was not paid for accrued holiday pay on termination of employment in the net sum of £996.50. | Upheld | — | £997 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £2,141.06 as compensation. | Upheld | — | £2,141 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,634
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.