Case 3332455/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Truscott v And Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION — 2020
- Case reference
- 3332455/2018
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Truscott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe supplied text is a Rule 69 certificate of correction for the judgment sent to the parties on 8 January 2020. It amends paragraph 68 of the reasons so that it reads that the claimant's appeal hearing was conducted by Mr Hackwell, and deletes the remainder of that paragraph because Mr Hackwell was not party to the email exchange with the Chief Executive on 3 August 2017.
The certificate is signed by Employment Judge Postle and dated 1 April 2020, and it records that the corrected version was sent to the parties on 1 June 2020. The text does not set out the tribunal's underlying substantive findings, the claim outcomes, or any remedy, so those matters are not extracted here.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The supplied text is a Rule 69 certificate of correction only. It does not state the underlying substantive claim outcome or any remedy. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.