Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

Tribunal Watch/And Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION/3332455/2018

Case 3332455/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr J Truscott v And Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION — 2020

Case reference: 3332455/2018
Decision date: 8 January 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Postle Date

Indexed: 26 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Truscott

Respondent

And Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

Claims brought

2 categories

Disability discrimination
Unfair dismissal

Source tags (gov.uk)

Disability Discrimination and Unfair Dismissal

Outcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Mr J Truscott v And Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION — Employment Tribunal 2020 | Tribunal Watch

Judgment 1 (PDF) ↗

Judgment 2 (PDF) ↗

Judgment 3 (PDF) ↗

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.