Case 3332483/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Elliott v Barnet and Southgate College PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 3332483/2018
- Decision date
- 4 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Elliott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied on 27 April 2020 to amend her claim to add what she described as ongoing post-employment victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. The alleged detriment was the respondent's failure to send her an unredacted copy of the Nazars report between 30 April 2019 and 31 August 2019, which she said prevented or undermined her appeal against the High Court judgment of Master Cook. The tribunal treated the application as an amendment to introduce a new cause of action based on events after the ET1.
Employment Judge Alliott found that the proposed amendment would require a significant increase in preparation and a fresh investigation into the High Court proceedings, the claims and submissions made there, and the surrounding judicial decisions. The judge noted that the claimant had been aware of the relevant facts by 31 August 2019, that the three-month time limit would have expired on 30 November 2019, and that the amendment application was not made until 27 April 2020. The judge held that it was not just and equitable to extend time.
The tribunal also took account of the timing of the application, which came after the final hearing had been converted into a preliminary hearing because of the pandemic, and described the application as opportunistic in that context. Balancing hardship to both parties, the tribunal concluded that it would not be fair and just to allow the amendment. The application was therefore dismissed, and there was no remedy award because the underlying proposed claim was not allowed to proceed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Application to amend claim to add a post-employment victimisation claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010 was refused. The tribunal did not determine the underlying victimisation allegations on their merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 29 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.