Case 3332540/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M. Duodu v Commserve Credit Union — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332540/2018
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr A.
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M. Duodu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record for the hearing at Cambridge on 11 October 2019, before Employment Judge Mr A. Spencer sitting alone, records only that the claimant, Mr M. Duodu, was ordered to pay the respondent, Commserve Credit Union, costs of £250.00. It does not set out any substantive merits findings on the underlying claims.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless either party requested them at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent. On the face of the written record, the only monetary order is the costs order in favour of the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment record does not state the substantive disposition of any underlying claim; it records only a costs order of £250 against the claimant. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.