Case 3332546/2018 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr N J Bambridge 2. Mr A Hides 3. Mr S Barrett 4. Mr T Shead 5. Mr C Wootton 6. Mr G Bunnage v In Tandem Resources Limited (in compulsory liquidation) and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 3332546/2018
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
4 namedClaimant
1. Mr N J Bambridge 2. Mr A Hides 3. Mr S Barrett 4. Mr T Shead 5. Mr C Wootton 6. Mr G Bunnage
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn its own initiative, Employment Judge Tynan reconsidered the judgment sent to the parties on 29 January 2021. The earlier judgment had struck out the claim against all named respondents.
The reconsideration judgment varied that order so that the claim was struck out only as against the first respondent, In Tandem Resources Limited (in compulsory liquidation). No merits findings, liability analysis, or monetary remedy are recorded in the reconsideration text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Reconsideration judgment varied the earlier 29 January 2021 strike-out so that the claim was struck out only as against the first respondent, In Tandem Resources Limited (in compulsory liquidation). The underlying substantive causes of action are not identified in this text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.