Case 3332595/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Daniella Vettraino v British Airways plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 3332595/2018
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Daniella Vettraino
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant.
No findings on the merits, liability, or remedy are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The listing categories identify sex discrimination, but the judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant and does not set out separate adjudicated issues. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The listing categories identify unlawful deduction from wages, but the judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant and does not set out separate adjudicated issues. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The listing categories identify Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant and does not set out separate adjudicated issues. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.