Case 3332614/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Roman v Superclean Commercial Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332614/2018
- Decision date
- 16 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Roman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Roman brought a claim against Superclean Commercial Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages. Employment Judge Khan sat alone at London Central on 14 August 2019. The respondent did not appear.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made a series of unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records the sum of those deductions as £159.09.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £159.09 within 28 days. No other remedy, uplift, or separate heads of loss were recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made a series of unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and ordered payment of £159.09 within 28 days. | Upheld | — | £159 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £159
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.