Case 3332655/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Ferber, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332655/2018
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms I Ferber, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Watford on 12 July 2019, Employment Judge Manley determined the claimant’s disability status for the purposes of the pending disability discrimination case. The respondent conceded that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 in relation to depression from May 2017.
The dispute was whether back pain also amounted to a disability, and from when. The tribunal reviewed the claimant’s medical records, including earlier intermittent back pain, the May 2017 workplace injury, and the January 2018 entries recording ongoing back pain after lifting cases of wine. It accepted Mr Cleary’s evidence that the claimant was stiff and restricted after the January 2018 incident.
Judge Manley found that the claimant had a physical impairment of back pain and that from January 2018 the effect of his back pain, taken alone or together with depression, had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. The tribunal did not find that he was disabled before January 2018, because there was insufficient evidence that the earlier back pain met the statutory test. The claim was allowed to proceed on the basis that the claimant was disabled because of depression throughout his employment and because of back pain and/or the combination of back pain and depression from January 2018 onwards.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The respondent conceded that the claimant was disabled by reason of depression from May 2017. The tribunal also found that he was disabled from January 2018 because of back pain and/or the combination of back pain and depression, but it did not determine the underlying merits of the discrimination claims. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- more than minor or trivial
- Boyle v SCA Packaging Limited [2009] ICR 1056 ('could well happen')
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.