Case 3332882/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Bowden v Department for Work and Pensions — 2019
- Case reference
- 3332882/2018
- Decision date
- 2 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Members
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
- Panel members
- Mrs Smith, Ms Feavearyear
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Bowden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Bury St Edmunds from 23 to 27 September 2019 before Employment Judge M Warren, sitting with Mrs Smith and Ms Feavearyear. The claimant was represented by Ms Kilgannon, her daughter-in-law, and the respondent by Mr A Henderson, counsel.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims of disability discrimination and victimisation failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning or factual findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states that the claimant's claim of disability discrimination failed and was dismissed; no written reasons are provided in the supplied text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The written judgment states that the claimant's claim of victimisation failed and was dismissed; the supplied text does not specify the protected characteristic or reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.