Case 3332903/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Lagowski v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3332903/2018
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Lagowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the proceedings were dismissed.
No substantive findings on unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, breach of contract, remedy, or liability are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The source listing categories include unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and breach of contract, but the judgment does not separately adjudicate or identify individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The disability discrimination classification is based on the supplied listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The breach of contract classification is based on the supplied listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded contract claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.