Case 3332907/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Malik v Titan Security — 2021
- Case reference
- 3332907/2018
- Decision date
- 16 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Malik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave Mr Malik an opportunity by letter dated 28 June 2021 to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Acting Regional Employment Judge R Lewis struck out the claim. The reasons section does not determine the substantive merits of any underlying complaint, and no remedy was awarded.
The judgment is limited to the case management decision to strike out the claim and does not record any findings on liability, compensation, or legal tests beyond the inactive-pursuit basis for striking out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not identify the underlying cause of action in the reasons section. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.