Case 3333061/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hall (deceased) v Bibby Distribution Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3333061/2018
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Hall (deceased)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short disposal judgment in which Employment Judge R Lewis recorded that the proceedings were dismissed because no action had been taken to progress them. The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the pleaded complaints.
The case listing identifies the matter as including race discrimination and unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself does not break out separate decisions on each claim. On the wording used, the tribunal simply dismissed the proceedings as a whole for عدم progress, without recording any liability findings or any remedy award.
The order is dated 15 October 2019 and was sent to the parties on 1 November 2019. No panel members are listed in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not identify the individual pleaded claims; the claim type is taken from the case listing. It records that the proceedings were dismissed because no action had been taken to progress them. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the individual pleaded claims; the claim type is taken from the case listing. It records that the proceedings were dismissed because no action had been taken to progress them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.