Case 3333377/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Cunningham v Nicky Ellicott — 2019
- Case reference
- 3333377/2018
- Decision date
- 16 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Cunningham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter an appearance and did not enter a response. The tribunal therefore entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 27 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, notice pay and holiday pay were well founded. The judgment does not set out substantive findings on the underlying facts, because liability was determined on the basis of the respondent's failure to respond.
The issue of remedy was not determined in this decision. The judgment states that remedy would be dealt with at the hearing on 13 March 2019, which was converted into a remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this claim as 'notice pay' rather than using a separate legal label. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.