Case 3333405/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Dhir v Home Office — 2019
- Case reference
- 3333405/2018
- Decision date
- 28 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daniels
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Dhir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal had ordered the claimant to provide detailed written reasons by 31 May 2019 explaining why her case should not be struck out, or why a costs or other order should not be made, on the basis of unreasonable conduct and/or the case not being actively pursued. The claimant was also required to copy the response to the respondent.
The claimant did not reply, no explanation was provided, and no further information was supplied as ordered. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claims for failure to comply with a Tribunal Order and/or for not being actively pursued, and stated that all claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not set out the particulars of the discrimination claim; the classification follows the listed category of Disability Discrimination. The judgment states that all claims were struck out and dismissed for failure to comply with a Tribunal Order and/or for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.