Case 3333407/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs U Monga v Phoenix Education Project Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3333407/2018
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs U Monga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Bedeau recorded that the respondent, Phoenix Education Project Ltd, failed to submit an ET3 and also failed to seek an extension of time to do so after the time for submission had expired. On that basis, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant, Mrs U Monga.
The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £430.00 net. It does not set out any findings on liability beyond the default judgment procedure, and it does not break the award down between the pleaded claims or give a separate remedy calculation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Default judgment was entered because the respondent did not submit an ET3 or seek an extension of time. The judgment records a single net award of £430.00 and does not apportion that sum between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Default judgment was entered because the respondent did not submit an ET3 or seek an extension of time. The judgment records a single net award of £430.00 and does not apportion that sum between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £430
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.