Case 3333549/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Dama, (Claimant’s wife) For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3333549/2018
- Decision date
- 11 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs G Dama, (Claimant’s wife) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 March 2019 before Employment Judge Skehan, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's unfair dismissal claim and holiday pay claims against Mr Parish and Ms McCormack. The tribunal held that Ms McCormack was not the claimant's employer and that the unfair dismissal claim against her had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal reached the same conclusion on the holiday pay claims. It struck out the holiday pay claims against Ms McCormack and against Mr Parish because neither respondent was the claimant's employer and the claims had no reasonable prospect of success. No substantive liability findings or monetary award were recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out on the basis that Ms McCormack was not the claimant's employer and the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claims against both respondents were struck out because Mr Parish and Ms McCormack were each found not to be the claimant's employer and the claims had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.