Case 3333839/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Ramjali v Kashflow Limited G Sherchan — 2020
- Case reference
- 3333839/2018
- Decision date
- 15 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Ramjali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 19 January 2020, the tribunal gave Mr G Ramjali an opportunity to make written representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 19 August 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Hawksworth struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment states simply that 'the claim is struck out' and records that the hearing listed for 1 to 5 June 2020 would not take place. No substantive findings were made on the underlying claims and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify individual substantive causes of action; it records that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 19 August 2019 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.