Case 3333851/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Mace v Reynolds Groundworks Services — 2021
- Case reference
- 3333851/2018
- Decision date
- 19 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Mace
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 19 April 2021, the Tribunal told Mr P Mace that it was considering striking out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. He was given the opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing explaining why strike out should not happen.
Mr Mace did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Cowen struck out the claim against Reynolds Groundworks Services.
The judgment is procedural only. It records no hearing on the merits and makes no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify this underlying claim separately; it states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify this underlying claim separately; it states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.