Case 3333870/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3333870/2018
- Decision date
- 11 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Salvatore Casanova, brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Mitie Limited after a TUPE transfer on 1 April 2018. Employment Judge Alliott said the case had been prepared in a way that made it impossible to determine what sum, if any, was due and owing, so the hearing focused on disputed factual issues and the matter was adjourned generally for the parties to try to agree any deductions and, if needed, return for a further listing.
On the overtime issue, the tribunal found that the claimant's contractual entitlement remained as it had been before transfer: enhanced overtime was payable only after 39 hours worked, not after 37.5 hours. Relying on the Compass Group payroll material and the employee liability information, the judge found that Saturday work carried payment at time and a half and Sunday work at double time. The tribunal also found that where a rest day was worked, the first rest day was paid at time and a half and the second at double time, and that if a Sunday was treated as the first rest day worked, double time applied.
The tribunal also dealt with a January 2019 sickness period. It found that the respondent's handbook did not answer the point because it dealt with sickness in excess of seven days, and that the respondent had previously indicated the claimant would be paid if he self-certified the absence. The judge calculated that 3 days' pay at 7.5 hours a day and £8.75 per hour came to £196.87 gross, subject to tax and National Insurance. No final overall award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.13 ERA 1996 alleging shortfall in wages from April 2018 to at least April 2019. The tribunal made findings of fact but did not finally determine the amount due; it adjourned generally so the parties could try to agree any sum outstanding. The judge found enhanced overtime was only payable after 39 hours, Saturday work attracted 1.5x pay, Sunday work 2x pay, and the claimant was due 3 days' sick pay for 29-31 January 2019 of £196.87 gross. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.