Case 3333923/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr T Perry, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019

Case reference: 3333923/2018
Decision date: 8 July 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Smail Appearances
Venue: Amersham

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr T Perry, Counsel For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Smail at Amersham on 21 May 2019. The tribunal substituted Enterprise Rent-a-Car Limited as the respondent.

The tribunal found that the claim included a claim of disability discrimination by association, pleaded as direct discrimination or harassment. It extended time for presentation of that disability discrimination claim to 4 October 2019.

The tribunal also extended time for presentation of the unfair dismissal claim to 4 October 2019. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the decision.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Preliminary hearing only; time for presentation of the unfair dismissal claim was extended to 4 October 2019.	Other	—	—
Disability discrimination	The tribunal recorded that the claim included disability discrimination by association, pleaded as direct discrimination or harassment, and extended time for presentation of that claim to 4 October 2019.	Other	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.