Case 3334158/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Mazouzi v Trenchless Technology Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 3334158/2018
- Decision date
- 27 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Mazouzi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr O Mazouzi was employed by Trenchless Technology Ltd between 23 April 2018 and 27 April 2018 at an agreed rate of £500 gross per week. It accepted that the agreed sum remained unpaid for that period.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the unpaid amount constituted an unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent did not attend the hearing.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £500 to the claimant within 14 days of the date of the order. No separate element of remedy was identified beyond that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant worked for the respondent between 23 April 2018 and 27 April 2018 at an agreed rate of £500 gross per week, that this amount remained unpaid, and that it constituted an unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.