Case 3334313/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Richards v Stanmore College — 2020
- Case reference
- 3334313/2018
- Decision date
- 27 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Finlay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Richards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this preliminary hearing on 27 March 2020, Employment Judge Finlay recorded that the claimant had originally brought a breach of contract complaint about the respondent’s failure to give notice of termination, saying the respondent had no contractual right to pay in lieu and that she had suffered losses including an additional year’s redundancy payment and holiday pay. The record states that the respondent had now paid those sums, and the claimant withdrew the breach of contract complaint, which was to be dismissed by consent.
The only live complaint left for the final hearing was ordinary unfair dismissal under sections 94 and 98 ERA 1996. The reason for dismissal was agreed to be redundancy under section 98(2)(c) ERA 1996; the issue identified for trial was whether the dismissal was fair under section 98(4), including whether the claimant had been notified that her job was at risk, whether consultation was adequate, whether there was a fair selection process, whether suitable alternative employment was offered, and whether the respondent could rely on the claimant’s failure to appeal.
The record also set out possible remedy issues if unfair dismissal were established, including whether any compensatory award should be reduced on a Polkey basis and whether either party had unreasonably failed to comply with an ACAS Code of Practice so as to justify an uplift or reduction under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. No merits findings or monetary award were made at this preliminary hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant withdrew the breach of contract complaint after the respondent had paid the sums sought; the record states that the complaint will now be dismissed by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.98(2)(c) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd [1987] UKHL 8
- s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- band of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.