Case 3334449/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Keenan v Haines Farm Eggs Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334449/2018
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Keenan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hawksworth sat alone in Reading on 6 August 2019. The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for holiday pay succeeded. It awarded £153.00, described as having been calculated by Acas and agreed by the parties.
The claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 3 September 2018 failed and was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal said the claimant's claim for holiday pay succeeded and awarded £153.00, calculated by Acas and agreed by the parties. | Upheld | — | £153 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 3 September 2018 failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £153
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.