Case 3334454/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Rawlings v Waters Edge Holdings Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334454/2018
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Rawlings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Reading on 1 August 2019, Employment Judge Hawksworth heard the case with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance or representation for the respondent. The written record states that the claimant’s complaints succeeded.
The tribunal awarded £1,436 gross for unpaid wages covering 26 July 2018 to 24 August 2018, £320 gross for one week’s notice pay, and £160 gross for holiday pay in lieu of untaken holiday. The total award recorded was £1,916 gross.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would be provided unless requested. The extracted decision therefore records the outcomes and award amounts, but does not set out further written reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as gross unpaid wages for the period 26 July 2018 to 24 August 2018. | Upheld | — | £1,436 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as gross one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £320 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as gross holiday pay in lieu of untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £160 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,916
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.