Case 3334463/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss AA Warren v Mr Chris Tearne & Mr D Fisher trading as ‘The Five Bells’ — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334463/2018
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss AA Warren
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Ord on 9 April 2019 in the case of Miss AA Warren against Mr Chris Tearne and Mr D Fisher trading as The Five Bells. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondents to pay the claimant £996.96 gross. It also ordered payment of an additional £67.15 pursuant to section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The hearing listed on 4 July 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £996.96 gross, plus an additional £67.15 pursuant to section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,064 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,064
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.