Case 3334510/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend nor represented For the v Mr S Sudra - Counsel — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334510/2018
- Decision date
- 21 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend nor represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningDr Abdolreza Ahari brought claims of direct race discrimination and victimisation against Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust. He said earlier tribunal proceedings in 1997 and about 2001 were protected acts and that detriments followed from 1998 onwards, with the pleaded allegations running through April and May 2016 and one later allegation about a complaint letter dated 27 October 2018. The tribunal heard the respondent's strike-out application at an open preliminary hearing on 15 August 2019, in the claimant's absence after refusing his postponement request.
Applying section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 and the strict approach to strike-out in discrimination cases, the tribunal held that the historical allegations were substantially out of time. It found that the claimant had not shown the series of allegations from 1998 to 2016 could be treated as conduct extending over a period, and he gave no reason why they could not have been brought earlier. The tribunal referred to Robertson v Bexley Community Centre, Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police v Caston, Ayanwu v South Bank Student Union, and Balls v Downham Market High School and College.
The tribunal also struck out the allegation based on the 27 October 2018 letter, which was the only allegation within the primary time limit. It found it wholly implausible that any failure or delay in dealing with that letter could amount to a detriment, given that Early Conciliation began on 30 October 2018 and proceedings were presented on 5 November 2018. Later 2018 allegations raised in correspondence were not included because no written amendment application had been made. The result was that the proceedings were struck out and nothing remained in the case.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal treated the historical allegations as out of time and struck out the only in-time allegation as having no reasonable prospect of success. Later 2018 allegations mentioned in correspondence were not part of the proceedings because no amendment application had been made. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal held that the alleged detriments, including the historical allegations and the 27 October 2018 letter complaint, had no reasonable prospect of success or were out of time. Later 2018 allegations were not included because no written amendment application was made. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 37 no reasonable prospect of success
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable time extension
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police v Caston
- Ayanwu v South Bank Student Union
- Balls v Downham Market High School and College
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.