Case 3334623/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented. For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334623/2018
- Decision date
- 16 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal arising from his dismissal for gross misconduct, including falsifying a safety record. The claim form was presented on 5 November 2018, but the tribunal found that, allowing for the early conciliation period, it should have been presented by 3 November 2018. The claimant did not identify any reason why it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claim was presented out of time and the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- rule 42 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Miah v Axis Security Services Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.