Case 3334679/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Watson v The Sports Injury Clinic (cambridge) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334679/2018
- Decision date
- 19 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Watson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Ord recorded that the claim succeeded. The extracted text does not specify the substantive type of claim(s) decided in this judgment, beyond the case title naming Mr A Watson and The Sports Injury Clinic (Cambridge) Limited.
The judgment states that remedy was not determined at this stage. Instead, the tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing listed for 15 July 2019. No monetary award is stated in the extracted text.
Because the judgment is a universal template with no further factual findings, no legal reasoning, and no identified remedy figures, the only recorded outcome is that the claim succeeded and the amount payable was left to be fixed later.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text is a Rule 21 default judgment and does not identify the underlying claim type(s) in the text provided. It records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing on 15 July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.