Case 3334727/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Francis v Orchard Serviced Apartments Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334727/2018
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Francis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's race discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. No substantive liability finding was made on that claim beyond the withdrawal recorded in the judgment.
The claimant's unpaid expenses claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The tribunal stated that it could not consider that breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 while the claimant remained employed.
The judgment also records that the claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay would continue to a full hearing. No remedy was assessed or awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's race discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's unpaid expenses claim was dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider that breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 while he remained employed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.