Case 3334755/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Josephine Ashdown v Bovis Homes Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3334755/2018
- Decision date
- 21 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Josephine Ashdown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cambridge on 21 November 2019, Employment Judge Michell sat alone and recorded that the claimant, Josephine Ashdown, was represented in person and assisted by Mr Simon Cox, while the respondent was represented by Mr McArthur, solicitor. The judgment deals only with the claimant's discrimination claim based on marital or civil partnership status.
The tribunal dismissed that claim under rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the claimant withdrew it. No substantive findings on liability were recorded, and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the claim pursuant to rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 after the claimant withdrew it. | Dismissed | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- r.52 of Sch 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.