Case 3335053/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3335053/2018
- Decision date
- 15 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Huntingdon
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 July 2019, Employment Judge Ord held that each claimant, Mr S Taylor and Mr D Taylor, had suffered unlawful deductions from wages because holiday pay had been mis-calculated. The judgment records that the claims succeeded on liability for unlawful deduction of wages.
The tribunal also found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimants to present their claims in time, and that each claim was presented within a reasonable time thereafter. That resolved the limitation issue in the claimants' favour.
Remedy was not determined in this decision. The tribunal adjourned the issue of remedy and directed the parties to notify it by 31 July 2019 if remedy was agreed; if not, the matter was to be listed for a 2-hour remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that each claimant, Mr S Taylor and Mr D Taylor, suffered unlawful deductions from wages by the mis-calculation of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.