Case 3335097/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and not represented v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 3335097/2018
- Decision date
- 29 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Did not attend and not represented
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the full merits hearing and was not represented. The tribunal was satisfied that the notice of hearing had been properly served at the address on the ET1 claim form and decided to proceed in his absence. It heard evidence for the respondent and read the parties' documents, including the ET1 presented on 30 November 2018 and the response presented on 2 January 2019.
The only claim recorded in the judgment was a notice pay claim under article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (E&W) Order 1994. The tribunal found that the claimant resigned with immediate effect on 29 October 2018, did not give notice, and that date was the effective date of termination of employment.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant was not entitled to notice pay and dismissed the claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim brought under article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (E&W) Order 1994. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.